Rebuild the comparison
Bind the workload, correctness rules, and comparable alternatives.
Product vision
The workload performance platform for AI infrastructure
Turn AI performance hypotheses into correct, reproducible improvements.
For applied researchers, performance engineers, and teams that co-design AI hardware and software.

Make the method reusable
Bind the workload, correctness rules, and comparable alternatives.
Keep settings, versions, every attempt, and known gaps together.
Show what the evidence supports and how another researcher can rerun it.
Make this decision and keep the method for the next one.
One continuous record
Keep the workload and correctness rule tied to every attempt, its observed stack, versions, gaps, comparison, and rerun recipe.
From hypothesis to the next experiment
Name the expected effect and the mechanism that might cause it.
Bind the exact workload with the correctness and performance measures that matter, its resource ceiling and stop conditions.
Declare what changes and what stays fixed. Keep requested settings apart from observed ones.
Capture every attempt with its actual configuration, measurements and failures.
Check correctness and hard limits first, then compare performance among eligible results.
Keep the retained runtime recipe (requested runtime and bundle digest) with its uncertainty and limits, then choose the smallest change that can alter the conclusion.
Output: the Performance Report, one exact record of the plan, evaluation, outcome, and runtime recipe.
Start with a bounded question. Run only when the controls and evidence sources are available.
Record the reference max_num_seqs setting.
Change only max_num_seqs.
Confirm the control is supported. Bound requests, duration, and resource use before launch.
Capture the actual configurations and measurements for every attempt, including failures.
Read charts beside the configuration difference, correctness checks, latency, throughput, and retained stack diagnostics.
Issue a Performance Report only after required checks pass. Otherwise retain HOLD and the next collection step.
Rerun the retained runtime recipe, then choose the next change from what the evidence explains.
A method that compounds
Start with one workload and one cluster. Extend across inference providers, GPU clouds, hardware builders, and research groups as each target earns fresh evidence.
Resolve one workload question with a comparison your team can inspect.
Rerun the retained runtime recipe and keep every attempt and gap.
Compare fresh, eligible evidence for each cluster and hardware target.
Use the observed tradeoffs to choose the next experiment with infrastructure partners.
Fits the workflow you already have
Performance IQ connects the question, correctness rules, observed stack and versions, every attempt and gap, comparison limits, runtime recipe, and next experiment.